Table 3.
The comparison of MRCS and SVM-MRCS methods using top-N channels.
| Average Accuracy (Standard Deviation) Using Top-N Channels | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top-N | MRCS | SVM-MRCS | Top-N | MRCS | SVM-MRCS |
| 3 | 51.95 (8.23) | 52.86 (8.41) | 12 | 56.93 (8.95) | 58.40 (10.20) * |
| 4 | 52.94 (7.49) | 55.08 (8.98) | 13 | 57.06 (9.01) | 58.54 (10.08) * |
| 5 | 54.51 (8.30) | 56.39 (8.95) | 14 | 57.38 (9.38) | 58.78 (10.27) * |
| 6 | 54.66 (8.89) | 57.39 (9.52) ** | 15 | 57.79 (9.34) | 58.73 (10.40) |
| 7 | 55.34 (8.90) | 57.71 (9.53) ** | 16 | 58.05 (9.83) | 58.97 (10.75) |
| 8 | 56.55 (8.92) | 58.16 (9.47) * | 17 | 58.34 (9.63) | 59.08 (10.92) |
| 9 | 56.62 (8.98) | 58.51 (10.05) * | 18 | 58.21 (9.61) | 59.10 (11.05) |
| 10 | 56.56 (8.75) | 58.43 (9.90) * | 19 | 58.22 (9.80) | 59.13 (11.00) |
| 11 | 56.53 (8.72) | 58.31 (10.05) * | 20 | 58.09 (9.79) | 58.93 (10.95) |
The significant difference was tested under the same number of selected channels (paired t-test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).