Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 6;16(10):1648. doi: 10.3390/s16101648

Table 3.

Performance assessment—counts of type I and type II errors (dv = 1 cm).

ID Number of Points % Error (α = 55°) % Error (α = 110°) % Error (α = 165°)
Lining Non-Lining Type I Type II Type I Type II Type I Type II
1 5085 864 0.000 3.588 0.059 3.241 0.275 0.116
2 4274 30 0.000 10.000 0.000 6.667 0.023 0.000
3 3953 17 0.101 5.882 0.228 5.882 1.644 0.000
4 4225 16 0.047 18.750 0.095 6.250 0.710 0.000
5 3948 21 0.101 4.762 0.304 0.000 1.773 0.000
6 3825 15 0.026 6.667 0.052 0.000 0.444 0.000
7 3421 25 0.000 8.000 0.000 4.000 0.000 0.000
8 3110 14 0.000 7.143 0.000 0.000 0.289 0.000
9 3188 17 0.063 5.882 0.125 5.882 0.878 0.000
10 3008 14 0.000 7.143 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Average 0.034 7.782 0.086 3.192 0.604 0.012

Note: non-lining points herein do not include outliers.