Table 1.
Comparison of different methods for ATP detection.
| Methods | Materials | Linear Range (μM) | LOD (nM) | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECL(using aptamer) | CdSe/ZnSquantum dots | 0.018~90.7 | 6 | [13] |
| ECL(using aptamer) | Magnetic nanoparticles-CdSe/CdS quantum dots | 0.01~0.8 | 3 | [12] |
| ECL(using aptamer) | [Ru(bpy)3]2+, single-walled carbonnanohorn | 0.005~50 | 1 | [9] |
| ECL(using aptamer) | [Ru(bpy)2dppz]2+ | 0.2~1 | 100 | [10] |
| FRET(using aptamer) | FAM-labelled DNA, graphene oxide | 3~320 | 450 | [20] |
| FRET(using aptamer) | FAM using SDR amplification | 0.02~0.6 | 20 | [21] |
| FRET(no aptamer) | The prepared ratiometric fluorescent probe: naphthalimide-rhodaminecompound | 0.1~10 | 100 | [19] |
| Fluorescence(using aptamer) | SYBR Green I using exonuclease-catalyzed target recycling amplification | 0.01~2 | 9.5 | [22] |
| LSPR(using aptamer) | Gold nanorod, TAMRA dye | 0.00001~10 | 10 pM | [1] |
| ITC(using aptamer) | Glucose oxidase | 10~100 | 10 μM | [48] |
| DPV(using aptamer) | Porphyrin functionalized graphene nanosheets | 0.0022~1.3 | 0.7 | [15] |
| Amperometry(no aptamer) | Glucose oxidase and hexokinase co-immobilizedPt electrode | 100~16000 | 2500 | [16] |
| PRA(no aptamer) | AuNPs, Zr(IV) | 0.1~15 | 28 | This work |
SWV: square-wave voltammetry; ECL: electrochemiluminescence; FRET: fluorescence resonance energy transfer; FAM: carboxyfluorescein; SDR: strand displacement reaction; LSPR: localized surface plasmon resonance; ITC: isothermal titration calorimetry; DPV: differential pulse voltammetry.