Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 19;16(10):1742. doi: 10.3390/s16101742

Table 1.

Surface (area) roughness data for the native flattened Ag wire and the different flattened Ag wires after chemical etching treatments. (n = 6, mean ± standard error of mean).

Rt (PV) (µm) Rp (µm) Rv (µm) Rq (RMS) (µm) Ra (µm) (Rq−Ra)/Ra (%)
Native 11.15 ± 0.89 5.83 ± 0.64 5.31 ± 0.53 1.27 ± 0.17 0.95 ± 0.10 32.20
30 s NH4OH 12.04 ± 1.15 5.99 ± 0.84 6.06 ± 0.67 1.02 ± 0.19 0.77 ± 0.15 31.90
10 s HNO3 14.63 ± 2.09 6.48 ± 1.01 8.15 ± 1.10 1.33 ± 0.27 1.03 ± 0.21 28.96
2 m HNO3 10.04 ± 0.59 4.97 ± 0.39 5.06 ± 0.23 1.23 ± 0.10 0.96 ± 0.09 27.51
30 s NH4OH + 10 s HNO3 13.09 ± 0.98 6.05 ± 0.58 7.03 ± 0.52 1.40 ± 0.30 1.05 ± 0.21 33.52
30 s NH4OH + 2 m HNO3 14.08 ± 1.92 5.98 ± 0.98 8.10 ± 1.10 1.95 ± 0.41 1.39 ± 0.30 40.08