Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 22;16(10):1760. doi: 10.3390/s16101760

Table 1.

Chemical properties of the studied HA samples (in part previously reported in Boguta and Sokołowska [33]).

HA No. Raw Soil Material Soil location N (%) C (%) N/C COOH (cmol·kg−1) COOH + OH (cmol·kg−1) Q6 (cmol·kg−1) E4/E6 E254/E436 ∆logK
HA1 Haplic Fluvisol (Alluvial soil) 51°09′ N/22°59 ′E 5.11 54.81 0.080 321 650 284 5.35 5.00 0.70
HA2 Haplic Cambisol (Brown soil) 50°32′ N/24°01′ E 3.70 51.24 0.062 411 741 266 5.69 5.59 0.67
HA3 Mollic Gleysol (Black Earth) 50°22′ N/23°39′ E 4.30 53.28 0.069 424 670 254 7.08 8.32 0.89
HA4 Stagnic Luvisol (Grey-brown soil) 50°38′ N/22°41′ E 3.35 58.97 0.049 260 499 261 6.17 6.48 0.75
HA5 Haplic Chernozem (Chernozem) 51°23′ N/22°35′ E 4.69 56.1 0.072 196 454 278 4.8 5.28 0.65