Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 28;28(10):2820–2829. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.2820

Table 5. Summary of therapeutic responses criteria at week 24.

Clinical end point Treatment groups

I (n=20) GT (n=20) EX (n=20) I+GT (n=20) I+EX (n=20) GT+EX (n=20)
ACR20 n (%) 10 (50%) 5 (25%) 8 (40%) 2 (10%) 10 (50%) 2 (10%)
ACR50 n (%) 7 (35%) 6 (30%) 9 (45%) 7 (35%) 2 (10%) 6 (30%)
ACR70 n (%) 3 (15%) 9 (45%) 3 (15%) 11 (55%) 8 (40%) 12 (60%)
EULAR response score
Good (>1.2%): 9 (45%) 10 (50%) 9 (45%) 11 (55%) 12 (60%) 15 (75%)
Moderate (0.6 to −1.2%) 5 (25%) 9 (45%) 5 (25%) 8 (44%) 3 (15%) 4 (20%)
No response (>0.6%) 6 (30%) 1 (5%) 6 (30%) 1 (5%) 5 (25%) 1 (5%)

ACR20: American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement; ACR50: American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement; ACR70: American College of Rheumatology 70% improvement. I: infliximab group; GT: green tea group; EX: exercise group; I + GT: infliximab + green tea; I + EX: infliximab + exercise group; GT + EX: green tea + exercise group; EULAR: European League Against Rheumatism