Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 1;5(3):261–270. doi: 10.3233/JHD-160210

Table 2.

Description of information for ATC

Complete sample Stage I Stage II Stage III Stage IV Stage V
(N = 84) (n = 12) (n = 22) (n = 19) (n = 14) (n = 17)
Variables n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) P-value (2-sided)
ATC formal/informal Formal 12 (14.3) 0 (0) 4 (18.2) 7 (36.8) 1 (7.1) 0 (0) P < 0.001
Informal 19 (22.6) 9 (75) 10 (45.5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
None 53 (63.1) 3 (25) 8 (36.4) 12 (63.2) 13 (92.9) 17 (100)
ATC use Yes 30 (35.7) 9 (25) 14 (63.6) 7 (36.8) 0 (0) 0 (0) P < 0.001
No 48 (57.1) 3 (75) 8 (36.4) 12 (63.2) 11 (78.6) 14 (82.3)
Used previously 6 (7.1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (21.4) 3 (17.7)
ATC information* Yes 37 (44) 4 (33.3) 10 (45.4) 14 (73.7) 4 (28.6) 5 (29.4) P = 0.045
No 46 (54.8) 8 (66.7) 12 (54.5) 5 (26.3) 10 (71.4) 11 (64.7)
ATC evaluation** Yes 27 (32.1) 0 (0) 7 (31.8) 12 (63.2) 4 (28.6) 4 (23.5) P = 0.006
No 56 (66.7) 12 (100) 15 (68.2) 7 (36.8) 9 (64.3) 13 (76.4)
ATC training Yes 17 (20.2) 0 (0) 5 (22.7) 7 (36.8) 2 (14.3) 3 (17.6) P = 0.150
No 67 (79.8) 12 (100) 17 (77.3) 12 (63.2) 12 (85.7) 14 (82.4)

ATC: Assistive Technologies for Cognition/cognitive disabilities. Chi-squares were used to calculate overall group differences; *1 missing in Stage V; **1 missing in Stage IV.