Table 2.
Diversity indices and neutrality test results based on the genetic analysis of mtDNA D-loop sequence fragments for the seven duck populations studied1
| Breed | N | S | Indel | NHap | Pi | K | Hd | Tajima’s D (p>0.10) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | 145 | 16 | 1 | 28 | 0.00317 | 1.921 | 0.799 | −0.891 (NS) |
| BaB | 36 | 7 | 1 | 12 | 0.00372 | 2.256 | 0.829 | 0.952 (NS) |
| BaW | 20 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0.00056 | 0.337 | 0.337 | 0.352 (NS) |
| BaJ | 15 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 0.00255 | 1.543 | 0.886 | 0.815 (NS) |
| BaL | 13 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 0.00237 | 1.436 | 0.833 | 0.387 (NS) |
| WKND | 21 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.00195 | 1.181 | 0.633 | −0.453 (NS) |
| KND_N | 20 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0.00302 | 1.832 | 0.689 | 1.809 (NS) |
| CD | 20 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 0.00372 | 2.253 | 0.789 | 0.466 (NS) |
1
Number of variable sites (S) number of haplotype (NHap), nucleotide diversity (Pi), and haplotype diversity (Hd), N = number of sequences, number of insertion or deletion (Indel), average number of nucleotide differences (K), Nageswari (BaB), Deshi white (BaW), Jinding (BaJ), Common Indigenous duck (BaL), White Korean native duck (WKND), Black Korean native duck (KND_N), Commercial duck (CD), and not significant (NS).