Table 4. Gender*sociocultural interactions in gradCPT performance.
Variable | Factor | F | FDR-corrected p |
---|---|---|---|
OE | Labor force*gender | T(16,420) = 3.87 | <0.001* |
SIGI*gender | T(15,610) = -3.73 | <0.001* | |
HDI*gender | T(16,390) = 3.91 | <0.001* | |
Poverty*gender | T(14,750) = -1.45 | 0.146 | |
CE | Labor force*gender | T(16,230) = -4.42 | <0.001* |
SIGI*gender | T(14,730) = 4.30 | <0.001* | |
HDI*gender | T(15,740) = -3.53 | <0.001* | |
Poverty*gender | T(14,250) = 1.87 | 0.062 | |
RT | Labor force*gender | T(16,420) = 1.60 | 0.109 |
SIGI*gender | T(15,794) = -1.66 | 0.096 | |
HDI*gender | T(16,457) = 1.67 | 0.095 | |
Poverty*gender | T(14,733) = -0.078 | 0.938 | |
CV | Labor force*gender | T(16,420) = -0.626 | 0.531 |
SIGI*gender | T(15,560) = 0.822 | 0.411 | |
HDI*gender | T(16,220) = -0.268 | 0.789 | |
Poverty*gender | T(14,700) = 0.718 | 0.473 |
Note.
* indicates significance after Bonferroni correction (cutoff = 0.003125).
OE = omission error, CE = commission error, Labor force = female/male ratio of labor force participation.