Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 14;30(4):1031–1045. doi: 10.1111/jvim.14356

Table 5.

Comparisons between groups of cats relative to the presence (Yes) or absence (No) of (1) clinical signs in general (2) anorexia, polyphagia, or a normal appetite, and (3) vomiting

Groups Clinical signs Appetite Vomiting
Yes No Anorexia Polyphagia Normal Appetite Yes No
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Ctrl (n = 8) 0 (0%)a 8 (100%) 0 (0%)a 0 (0%)b 8 (100%)a 0 (0%)a 8 (100%)
IBD (n = 13) 8 (61.5%)b 5 (38.5%) 6 (46.2%)b,c 0 (0%)b 7 (53.8%)b 5 (38.5%)b 8 (61.5%)
Ch (n = 6) 2 (33.3%)a,b 4 (66.7%) 1 (16.7%)a,b,c 1 (16.7%)a,b 4 (66.7%)a,b 2 (33.3%)a,b 4 (66.7%)
IBD+Ch (n = 16) 6 (37.5%)b 10 (62.5%) 3 (18.8%)a,c 0 (0%)b 13 (81.3%)a,b 4 (25%)a,b 12 (75%)
IBD+Ch+P (n = 8) 8 (100%)c 0 (0%) 5 (62.5%)b 3 (37.5%)a 0 (0%)c 7 (87.5%)c 1 (12.5%)

a, b, c: proportions in the same column followed by common superscript letter do not differ significantly based on the results of a series of z‐tests. By contrast, a statistically significant difference exists among proportions followed by different superscript letter.

Ctrl: controls.

IBD: cats with histopathological evidence of IBD.

Ch: cats with histopathological evidence of cholangitis.

IBD+Ch: cats with histopathological evidence of IBD and cholangitis.

IBD+Ch+P: cats with histopathological evidence of IBD, cholangitis, and pancreatitis.