Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 1;5:e19274. doi: 10.7554/eLife.19274

Figure 3. Association of metabolic proteins in crowded environments.

(A) Intermolecular distance changes between initial and final time (ΔdAB) for pairs of glycolytic enzymes, other regular proteins, RNAs, and ribosomes/GroEL (huge). (B) Solvation free energies ΔGsol normalized by the solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) for equilibrated copies of macromolecules in MGm1 using GBMV (Lee et al., 2003) in CHARMM (Brooks et al., 2009). See also supplementary Figure 1 showing the influence of large macromolecules on the association of small proteins based on simple Lennard-Jones mixtures.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19274.015

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Influence of large macromolecules on the association of small proteins.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

(AD) Two-component mixtures of small Lennard-Jones particles ‘A’ (2 Å, white) in the presence of same size particles ‘B’ (LJ_AB) or in the presence of larger particles ‘C’ (3.509 Å, LJ_AC) or ‘D’ (5.570 Å, LJ_AD) occupying the same volume (3400 Å3) in a (18.666 Å)3 cubic box. In an additional simulation, LJ_AD_rep, the ‘D’ particle had a unit charge to create repulsion. (E) Pairwise density distribution function ρ(r) for ‘A’ particles in LJ_AB (blue), in LJ_AC (green), LJ_AD (red) and LJ_AD_rep (dashed red). (F) Cumulative numbers of particles within spherical shells around ‘A’ particles show an extra particle in LJ_AD and LJ_AD_rep beyond r = 4 Å but with the difference disappearing in LJ_AD_rep at 6 Å.