Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov;109:112–123. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.07.003

Table 4.

List of clusters showing a significant association between a behavioural performance and functional connectivity at rest for each seed for Group A. This table reports all effects significant at the standard threshold of 0.05. Asterisks () indicate the clusters surviving the adjusted alpha value of 0.005 which were seeded in Group B. Note that − (minus) indicates poor performance, + (plus) indicates good performance, ‘&’ indicates global task performance. Anatomical labels were provided by the Harvard-Oxford Atlas implemented in FSL view.

Seed Contrast Brain area Voxel p Z x y z
Synonyms frequency aSTG HF – R Frontal Pole 2408 >0.001 5.2 40 20 −18
HF – R Frontal Pole 658 0.024 4.2 12 50 36
HF&LF − R Lateral Occipital 605 0.036 4.9 32 −78 30
LF > HF L Frontal Orbital Cortex 1857 >0.001 4.4 −28 20 −22
VWFA HF + R STG 948 0.004 4.6 56 −10 −4
HF > LF RSTG 580 0.048 3.5 54 −10 −6



SynonymsI mageability aSTG HI − L Precuneus 884 0.006 3.7 −10 −72 28
HI&LI − L Precuneus 940 0.004 4.1 −6 −68 36
HI&LI – R Lateral Occipital Cortex 673 0.023 4.5 34 −78 30



Letter and category fluency aIFG Cat + R Fusiform Gyrus 1151 0.001 4.1 22 −86 −14
Cat > Let L Post central gyrus 643 0.033 3.8 −6 −44 66
pIFG Cat − R MTG 655 0.039 3.5 56 −60 8
Let − R Precuneus 977 0.006 3.7 22 −56 14
Cat > Let L Lingual Gyrus 707 0.028 3.5 −16 −42 −6
aSTG Cat + L Cerebellum 876 0.006 4.5 −10 −38 −32
Cat + R Fusiform Gyrus 756 0.013 4.2 28 −38 −28