Table 2.
Criteria for designing electrospun fibers and TE scaffolds.
Function | Design criteria |
---|---|
Strong, uniform and bead-free fibers | High-molecular-weight polymers having high ionic conductivity, concentration, or viscosity; high operating voltage in electrospinning process [39] |
Thin fibers, needle-like tip design | Electrospinning at high voltages and low flow rates [40] |
Aligned electrospun fibers | High rotating target speed [40]; collector geometry |
Structural stability to retain tissue shape | Maintaining mechanical properties throughout the 3D scaffold by strong electrospun nanofibers |
Transport of nutrients and waste in and out of the electrospun scaffold | High porosity and interconnectivity between pores formed by maintaining preferred orientation of fibers [41] |
Degradation integrity of electrospun scaffold to leave host tissue | Balancing degradation and formation of tissue without toxic by-products [42] |
Elimination of inflammatory response or toxicity from the electrospun scaffold | Materials must be biocompatible, nontoxic and noncarcinogenic |
High cell seeding density and cell migration leading to tissue growth throughout the scaffold | Large pore size, high porosity and high interconnectivity between pores using preferred unit cell geometry of the electrospun scaffolds [43] |
Better cell attachment and proliferation | Optimized surface chemistry/topography and high surface-to-volume ratio |
New cell or ECM growth in preferred direction | Proper fiber orientation within the scaffold [22] |
Growth of 3D tissues and organs | Specific 3D shape of electrospun scaffolds using preferred unit cell geometry [43] |