Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 1;37(40):3081–3089. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv521

Table 1.

Negative randomized trials comparing endovascular intervention (±thrombolysis) vs. intravenous thrombolysis alone

IMS III MR rescue Synthesis
Baseline
 Total number of patients enrolled 656 118 362
 Mean number of enrolled patients per centre per year 2.0 0.8 3.6
 Median age 69 65 66
 Minimal baseline NIHSS allowed 8 6 2
 Median NIHSS at baseline 17 17 13
 Confirmation of major artery occlusion by CT-/MR-angiography No Yes No
 Penumbra imaging used for patient selection No Partly No
 i.v. thrombolysis use in the intervention arm 100% 37% 0%
Time delays
 Time delay as entry criterion tPA given within <3 h Enrolment within <8 h Enrolment within <4.5 h
 Stroke onset—tPA start time 122 min 165 min
 Stroke onset—reperfusion time in the group with intervention 5.4 h 7 h 3.8 h
Treatment
 Periprocedural anticoagulants/antiplatelets Heparin 2000 U i.v., followed by 450 U/h during intervention Heparin 5000 U i.v., followed by 500 U/h during intervention
 Stent-retrievers use (intervention group) 1% 0% 12.7%
 Procedural complications 26.5%
Outcomes
 Reperfusion (TICI Grade 2b or 3) 43% 44%
 Favourable neurologic outcome (mRs 0–2 at 90 days) in the intervention group 41% 19% 42%
 Favourable neurologic outcome (mRs 0–2 at 90 days) in the i.v. thrombolysis group 39% 20% 46%
 Symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (intervention group) 6.2% 4.7% 5.5%
 Subarachnoid haemorrhage 11.5%
 Asymptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (intervention group) 27.4% 65.6%
 Early mortality (7 days) in the intervention group 12% 8%
 Late mortality (90 days) in the intervention group 19.1% 19% 14.4%