Table 2.
Comparison of fit indices for solutions with different number of classes for women
| No. of Classes | BIC | Sample-Size Adj. BIC | AIC | VLMR Adj. LRT | VLMR p | No. in Smallest Class | Entropy Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 5360.5 | 5319.3 | 5319.8 | 471.5 | .0001 | 46 | 0.84 |
| 3 | 5257.4 | 5200.5 | 5201.1 | 123.9 | .54 | 34 | 0.82 |
| 4 | 5139.8 | 5066.9 | 5068.0 | 137.9 | .17 | 33 | 0.87 |
| 5 | 5072.3 | 4983.6 | 4984.6 | 89.7 | .07 | 7 | 0.88 |
| 6 | Did not replicate best log likelihood | ||||||
Note: BIC, Bayesian information criterion; AIC, Akaike information criterion; VLMR, Vuong–Lo–Mendel–Rubin likelihood ratio test.