Table 8. Sex prediction comparison.
| First Author | Year | Ref. | Features | Hand | Accuracy Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Case | 2007 | [18] | Index Proximal Phalange | Right | 73.7 |
| Ring Proximal Phalange | |||||
| Little Intermediate Phalange | |||||
| Index Distal Phalange | |||||
| Middle Distal Phalange | |||||
| Ring Proximal Phalange | |||||
| Ring Proximal Phalange | |||||
| Ring Proximal Phalange | |||||
| Index Proximal Phalange | Left | 69.4 | |||
| Ring Proximal Phalange | |||||
| Little Intermediate Phalange | |||||
| Index Distal Phalange | |||||
| Middle Distal Phalange | |||||
| Ring Proximal Phalange | |||||
| Ring Proximal Phalange | |||||
| Ring Proximal Phalange | |||||
| T. Kanchan | 2009 | [8] | Width Palm Knuckles | Right | 78.0 |
| Width Palm Knuckles | Left | 74.3 | |||
| Our Implementation | 2016 | Wrist To Little | Right | 88.7 | |
| Wrist Breadth | |||||
| Little Proximal Phalange | |||||
| Wrist Breadth | Left | 87.8 | |||
| Wrist To Thumb |