Figure 7. Evaluation of in-cohort sociability in Fmr1 knockouts and wild-type littermate controls undertaken in two different laboratories.
(a, Fmr1 knockout n = 22, wild-type control n = 18) vs. (b, Fmr1 knockout n = 11, wild-type control n = 9) – gives corresponding results. A histogram illustrating score of Fmr1 knockouts is shifted to the left as compared to that for wild-type control, signifying less time voluntarily spent together with other subjects within a tested cohort.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19532.028
Figure 7—source data 1. We include source data for Figures 6, 7 and 8 concerning reproducibility results of both Eco-HAB measures.
The names of the Excel sheetsrefer to corresponding figures and contain data used for analysis of the behavioral measures obtained by the implementation of Eco-HAB.py software (see Materials and methods).
elife-19532-fig7-data1.xlsx (9.8KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.19532.029
Figure 7—source data 2. We include source data for Figures 6, 7 and 8 concerning reproducibility results of both Eco-HAB measures.
The names of the Excel sheetsrefer to corresponding figures and contain data used for analysis of the behavioral measures obtained by the implementation of Eco-HAB.py software (see Materials and methods).
elife-19532-fig7-data2.xlsx (9.3KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.19532.030