Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Densitom. 2014 Aug 13;18(3):408–418. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2014.07.003

Table 6.

Changes in Bone Variables Required to Yield 50% Increase in Odds for Fractures

Modality Radius bone outcome OR (95% CI) Difference in bone outcome
HR-pQCT Ct.Th 1.50 (1.05, 2.14) −0.114 mm
pQCT Ct.Th 1.50 (0.40, 5.66) −0.301 mm
HR-pQCT vBMDc 1.50 (1.04, 2.16) −42.50 mg/cm3
pQCT vBMDc 1.50 (0.20, 11.52) −440.72 mg/cm3
Age-adjusted values
 HR-pQCT Ct.Th 1.50 (1.00, 2.25) −0.126 mm
 pQCT Ct.Th 1.50 (0.02, 132.07) −0.956 mm
 HR-pQCT vBMDc 1.50 (0.98, 2.30) −47.70 mg/cm3
 pQCT vBMDc 1.50 (0.00, +N)

Modality Tibia bone outcome OR (95% CI) Difference in bone outcome

HR-pQCT Ct.Th 1.50 (1.00, 2.26) −0.228 mm
pQCT Ct.Th 1.50 (0.54, 4.17) −0.327 mm
HR-pQCT vBMDc 1.50 (1.05, 2.14) −38.99 mg/cm3
pQCT vBMDc 1.50 (0.95, 2.36) −81.91 mg/cm3
Age-adjusted values
 HR-pQCT Ct.Th 1.50 (0.91, 2.47) −0.265 mm
 pQCT Ct.Th 1.50 (0.30, 7.52) −0.490 mm
 HR-pQCT vBMDc 1.50 (1.00, 2.26) −41.76 mg/cm3
 pQCT vBMDc 1.50 (0.78, 2.88) −110.48 mg/cm3

Note: Logistic regression equations were used to extrapolate the magnitude of difference in Ct.Th and cortical vBMD required to yield an OR of 1.50 at the 95% confidence level for both pQCT and HR-pQCT. Values were reported separately for bone outcomes derived from the radius and tibia as well as with and without adjustment for age. Bold indicates variables that were significant at the 95% confidence level in binary logistic regression models. The symbol “—” indicates estimates that were not generated because of infinite CIs around the OR.

Abbr: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; Ct.Th, cortical thickness; HR-pQCT, high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography; vBMDc, cortical volumetric bone mineral density.