Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Sep 4;25(11):1219–1227. doi: 10.1002/pds.4094

Table 3.

Results for the secondary outcome of percentage of days that adherence was incorrect, among all participants, and stratified by INR at enrollment.

% incorrect adherence a Minimally adjusted model b Fully adjusted model c
n Median (IQR) Difference (95% CI) d P value e Difference (95% CI) d P value e
All participants 0.03 0.008
 Control 57 23.7 (8.1–40.5) Referent Referent
 Lottery 65 12.1 (6.6–25.0) −7.9 (−14.1, −1.7) −7.4 (−14.4, −0.3)
 Reminder 63 21.8 (6.9–39.5) 0.5 (−7.5, 8.5) −2.0 (−8.2, 4.2)
 Lottery + Reminder 66 17.6 (7.0–43.6) −3.1 (−10.2, 4.1) −4.6 (−11.1, 1.9)
Participants with an inrange INR at enrollmentf 0.03 0.01
 Control 46 25.0 (8.1–40.3) Referent Referent
 Lottery 51 12.1 (5.9–25.0) −8.1 (−14.6, −1.6) −7.5 (−14.7, −0.3)
 Reminder 49 23.5 (9.5–39.5) 1.2 (−7.6, 10.0) −1.4 (−7.9, 5.1)
 Lottery + Reminder 53 17.1 (7.0–32.6) −3.9 (−11.5, 3.7) −5.0 (−11.7, 1.8)
Participants with a below-range INR at enrollment f 0.75 0.73
 Control 11 16.9 (7.7–42.3) Referent Referent
 Lottery 14 14.5 (8.5–26.5) −7.7 (−25.9, 10.5) −7.9 (−24.5, 8.8)
 Reminder 14 20.9 (6.1–33.5) −2.2 (−22.4, 18.1) −4.6 (−22.5, 13.3)
 Lottery + Reminder 13 34.2 (10.5–44.5) 0.5 (−19.9, 21.0) −3.6 (−21.1, 14.0)

IQR, inter-quartile range (25th–75th percentile); CI, confidence interval

a

Percentage of days that adherence was incorrect, calculated over the entire study period for each participant.

b

Adjusted for site (Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania or Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center), INR at enrollment (in range or below range), and month since randomization. Model coefficients transformed back from the square root term so that the reported differences are model based estimates of the mean % incorrect adherence.

c

Adjusted for site (Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania or Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center), INR at enrollment (in range or below range), month since randomization, age in years, African American race, completed high school, employment status (working, unemployed, retired, disabled), Medicare insurance, target INR range (2.0–3.0 or 2.5–3.5), and history of diabetes mellitus. Model coefficients transformed back from the square root term so that the reported differences are model based estimates of the mean % incorrect adherence.

d

Difference corresponds to the estimated difference in average % incorrect adherence relative to the control group.

e

P values obtained from multivariable Wald test of the null hypothesis that the lottery, reminder, and lottery + reminder differences are all equal to 0.

f

There was no evidence that odds ratios differed by INR at enrollment (interaction P=0.95).