Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 2;9(8):961–972. doi: 10.1007/s11869-016-0398-z

Table 2.

Estimates of excess deaths attributable to changes in PM2.5 concentration over time by form of hazard function (linear or non-linear), cohort (CanCHEC and CPS II), and country (Canada and USA)

Country (population weighted change in PM2.5) Hazard model form—cohort Number of excess deathsa (95 % confidence interval) Percent change in baseline mortality rate
Canada (2.0 μg/m3) Linear—CanCHEC 3480 (2940–4020) 1.55
Linear—CPS II 3090 (2430–3750) 1.38
Non-linear optimal—CanCHEC 3146 (2700–3610) 1.41
Non-linear ensemble—CanCHEC 3320 (2720–4060) 1.48
Non-linear optimal—CPS II 4300 (3420–5200) 1.92
Non-linear ensemble—CPS II 4240 (3100–5560) 1.90
Combined non-linear ensemblea 3640 (2780–4500) 1.62
USA (3.7 μg/m3) Linear—CanCHEC 68,700 (58,000–79,300) 2.82
Linear—CPS II 60,900 (47,500–74,100) 2.50
Non-linear optimal—CanCHEC 46,600 (39,700–53,400) 1.92
Non-linear ensemble—CanCHEC 49,000 (40,700–57,100) 2.01
Non-linear optimal—CPS II 77,700 (62,200–93,100) 3.20
Non-linear ensemble—CPS II 76,700 (60,600–93,000) 3.15
Combined non-linear ensemblea 61,900 (34,700–89,100) 2.54

aMeta-analytic combination of CanCHEC and CPS II ensemble models