Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 3;95(12):1931–1942. doi: 10.1007/s00277-016-2810-z

Table 3.

Andersen-Gill regression model with the endpoint EFS analysed on an intention-to-treat basis

HR 95 % CI p value
Genetic risk according to ELN
 Favorable risk’ 0.38 0.31–0.47 <0.0001
 Intermediate-2’ 1.05 0.86–1.30 0.62
 Adverse-risk’ 1.80 1.48–2.18 <0.0001
s/t-AML 1.28 1.04–1.57 0.020
Gender (male) 1.35 1.17–1.56 <0.0001
WBC (Median-dichotomized)* 1.29 1.11–1.49 0.001
Valproic acid 1.22 1.02–1.47 0.032
Allogeneic HCT in 1st CR 0.47 0.38–0.60 <0.0001
ATRA 0.99 0.86–1.14 0.87

Variables excluded after limited backward selection in the order of their exclusion: DNMT3A mutational status (p = 0.82), ASXL1 mutational status (p = 0.70), RUNX1 mutational status (p = 0.56), FLT3-TKD (p = 0.48), IDH2 mutational status (p = 0.39), IDH1 mutational status (p = 0.32) and age (p = 0.10)

*The median WBC of the whole cohort was 12.7 G/L