Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 3;95(12):1931–1942. doi: 10.1007/s00277-016-2810-z

Table 4.

Andersen-Gill regression model with the endpoint EFS analysed on a per-protocol basis

HR 95 % CI p value
Genetic risk according to ELN
 Favorable risk 0.38 0.31–0.47 <0.0001
 Intermediate-2’ 1.05 0.86–1.29 0.63
 Adverse risk 1.79 1.48–2.17 <0.0001
s/t-AML 1.28 1.04–1.58 0.018
Gender (male) 1.35 1.17–1.56 <0.0001
WBC (median-dichotomized)* 1.27 1.10–1.47 0.001
Valproic acid 1.22 1.02–1.47 0.032
Allogeneic HCT in 1st CR 0.47 0.37–0.59 <0.0001
ATRA 0.88 0.76–1.01 0.07

Variables excluded after limited backward selection in the order of their exclusion: DNMT3A mutational status (p= 0.87), ASXL1 mutational status (p = 0.72), RUNX1 mutational status (p = 0.61), FLT3-TKD (p = 0.53), IDH2 mutational status (p = 0.35), IDH1 mutational status (p = 0.34) and age (p = 0.08)

*The median WBC of the whole cohort was 12.7 G/L