Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 20;2016:6982739. doi: 10.1155/2016/6982739

Table 4.

Content validity: content comparison GRS-C/GRS-UK.

Item Percentage of statements in common (%)
(1) Consent process 11/13 (85)
(2) Safety 10/13 (77)
(3) Comfort 10/11 (91)
(4) Quality of the procedure 9/11 (82)
(5) Appropriateness 10/15 (67)
(6) Communicating results to referrer 7/11 (64)
(7) Quality of access and equity of provision 9/13 (69)
(8) Timeliness 13/14 (93)
(9) Booking responsiveness and flexibility 7/10 (70)
(10) Privacy and dignity 11/12 (92)
(11) Aftercare 15/16 (94)
(12) Ability to provide feedback to the service 7/10 (70)