Table 5.

Construct validity: select GRS-C statements versus auditable outcomes.

GRS-C statement	6-month GRS-C outcome	Measureable auditable outcome at the time of completion of third iteration of the GRS
(1.1) There is a published patient information sheet	Yes	180/272 (66%; 95% CI 60; 72) of patients had received an information sheet∗
(3.4) Unacceptable comfort levels prompt a review during the procedure; this review includes the technique, sedation level, and indication for the procedure	Yes	Did you feel the doctor and nurse were attentive to make sure that you were comfortable during the colonoscopy? 269/272 (99%; 95% CI 97; 100) of patients responded “yes”∗
(7.5) Facility and procedure information is available in written and/or electronic form in the most prevalent community languages, as determined by needs assessment	Yes	Was the information related to your colonoscopy provided in a language you could understand? 267/272 (98%; 95% CI 96; 99) responded yes∗
(8.5) Wait for urgent procedures is less than two weeks from referral	Yes	Wait list data at site confirms that patients are scoped within 2 weeks
(9.9) Patients are given a choice about the date and time of day of their appointment	Yes	Were you offered a choice of dates/times for your colonoscopy? 147/272 (54%; 95% CI 48; 60) responded “yes”∗

^∗Data from patient satisfaction survey.