Table 1.
Question no. | Wording of question |
---|---|
1 | Did the clinicians* talk to you in a way that was easy to understand? |
2 | Do you have confidence in the clinicians' professional skills? |
3 | Did you get sufficient information about how examinations and tests were to be performed? |
4 | Did you get sufficient information about your diagnosis/conditions? |
5 | Did you perceive the treatment to be adapted to your situation? |
6 | Were you involved in decisions regarding your treatment? |
7 | Did you perceive the institution work practices to be well organised? |
8 | Did you perceive the equipment at the institution to be in good working order? |
9 | Overall, was the help and treatment you received at the institution satisfactory? |
10 | Do you believe that you were in any way given incorrect treatment (according to your own judgement)? |
11 | Did you have to wait before you were given an appointment at the institution? |
12 | Overall, what benefit have you had from the care at the institution? |
13 | Did the hospital specialist lack basic medical information from your GP about the reason for your visit or test results? |
14 | After you saw the hospital specialist, did your GP lack important information about the care you got from the specialist? |
15 | Was the referral to the outpatient department necessary (according to your own judgement)? |
16a | Were you referred by your GP for the outpatient appointment? |
16b | If no in question 16a; who referred you? |
17 | If you take an overview of your entire treatment process, how would you evaluate the institution? |
*With ‘clinicians’, we mean those who had the main treatment responsibility. This is linguistically clearer in the Norwegian wording.