Table 2.
Regions | District | Source | Nature | Samples | Number of E. coli isolates | AMR E. coli | % AMR E. coli |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dry-arid | |||||||
Longido | Tap | Closed | 7 | 9 | 5 | 55 | |
Monduli | Pond | Open | 11 | 220 | 64 | 29 | |
River | Open | 2 | 12 | 5 | 41 | ||
Tap | Closed | 8 | 44 | 30 | 68 | ||
Simanjiro | Pond | Open | 6 | 83 | 21 | 25 | |
River | Open | 2 | 36 | 11 | 30.5 | ||
Stream | Open | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100 | ||
Well | Closed | 3 | 42 | 24 | 57 | ||
Total | 40 | 447 | 161 | ||||
Lush-mountainous | |||||||
Arumeru | River | Open | 39 | 672 | 378 | 56 | |
Stream | Open | 1 | 26 | 25 | 96 | ||
Tap | Closed | 6 | 109 | 33 | 30 | ||
Well | Closed | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
Arusha | Pond | Open | 2 | 6 | 5 | 83 | |
River | Open | 12 | 190 | 70 | 37 | ||
Stream | Open | 7 | 71 | 41 | 58 | ||
Tap | Closed | 15 | 196 | 91 | 46 | ||
Well | Closed | 4 | 10 | 4 | 40 | ||
Moshi | Pond | Open | 3 | 4 | 1 | 25 | |
River | Open | 4 | 10 | 2 | 20 | ||
Stream | Open | 3 | 24 | 16 | 66 | ||
Tap | Closed | 18 | 52 | 28 | 54 | ||
Total | 115 | 1,372 | 694 |
Distribution of samples and antimicrobial resistant (AMR) E. coli isolated from open- and closed-water sources located in two different regions of northern Tanzania