Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2016 Jun 21;37(6):353–372. doi: 10.1002/bem.21987

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© 2016 The Authors. Bioelectromagnetics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

PMC Copyright notice

Comparison of total symptom scores between controls and self‐selected EHS subjects. 1a. Histogram showing total symptom scores. EHS: electromagnetic hypersensitivity. 1b. Box‐and‐whisker plots showing total symptom scores. Plots inside ellipse represent outliers that are not within normal range. Note: differences in median scores of total symptoms between self‐selected EHS subjects (n = 127) and controls (n = 127) were compared using a Mann–Whitney U‐test with Bonferroni correction for multiple tests (100 tests; P < 0.0005); ***P ≤ 0.00001. For 1a and 1b: The ^a25th percentile (16 points), ^b50th percentile (29 points), and ^c75th percentile value of controls (47 points). 1c. Radar chart showing median values of symptoms for eight principal components (factors 1–8). Differences in median values of symptoms for all eight principal components between self‐selected EHS subjects (n = 127) and controls (n = 127) were analyzed using a Mann–Whitney U‐test as above. There were significant differences (P ≤ 0.00001) in median values of symptoms for all eight principal components.