Table 3.
Diagnostic methods of CMV, advantages, and disadvantages
| Diagnostic method | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Anti-CMV immunoglobulins | Might be used for screening for latent CMV infection | Low sensitivity and specificity for active infection |
| CMV PCR assays | High sensitivity and specificity and considered gold standard, quick easy to perform, gives information of viral load, can be used for wide variety of samples | Better to be performed on whole blood, qualitative might be so sensitive and detect “innocent viral shedding” quantitative might be superior |
| CMV antigen assays | Quick and easy to perform, has comparable sensitivity and specificity to PCR | Might be inferior to PCR in case of leukopenia |
| Viral culture | Highly specific, can be performed on wide variety of samples | Time-consuming, low sensitivity |
| Histopathology | Highly specific, confirm CMV disease and pathogenicity and invasiveness | Invasive, low sensitivity, liable to sampling error, needs skilled pathologist and so operator dependent |