Table 6.
Year | Men <65 | Women <65 | <65 group | Men 65+ | Women 65+ | 65+ group | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 | $70,677 | $44,031 | $53,892 | $55,436 | $54,792 | $55,082 | $54,961 |
2006 | $54,089 | $56,705 | $55,662 | $54,692 | $53,092 | $53,778 | $53,984 |
2007 | $60,357 | $61,511 | $61,067 | $60,187 | $57,857 | $58,878 | $59,114 |
2008 | $79,089 | $64,486 | $69,820 | $58,526 | $56,732 | $57,550 | $59,200 |
2009 | $80,601 | $74,991 | $77,067 | $63,838 | $60,651 | $61,994 | $63,809 |
2010 | $88,219 | $74,063 | $78,232 | $68,213 | $68,008 | $68,103 | $69,504 |
2011 | $76,896 | $82,377 | $80,396 | $57,580 | $69,425 | $64,063 | $66,282 |
2012 | $81,715 | $81,822 | $81,785 | $87,302 | $70,074 | $77,736 | $78,317 |
r2 | 0.49 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.53 | 0.89 | 0.80 | 0.87 |
p value | 0.05 | 0.00009 | 0.00009 | 0.04 | 0.0004 | 0.003 | 0.0007 |
Co (LCL; UCL) | 3291 (−81; 6662) | 5251 (3872; 6629) | 4496 (3302; 5690) | 3177 (182; 6173) | 2655 (1745; 3564) | 2882 (1461; 4304) | 3104 (1921; 4287) |
Italic values indicate statistically significance at p < 0.05