Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 3;66(2):93–98. doi: 10.1007/s10858-016-0056-7

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Double quantum–single quantum correlation data from labelled mouse fur. Bottom—One bond correlations involving amide, aromatic, and α-carbons; Top—One bond correlations among aliphatic carbons (the Ile Cα−Cβ cross peak is clear at higher contour levels as plotted in Fig. S3, and its position is asterisked in Fig. 1). Corresponding spectral regions from the 1D CP spectrum are overlaid in red. Fur was shaved from a mouse pup, and tightly packed directly into a 4 mm zirconia MAS rotor. Spectra showed insignificant interindividual variation. SsNMR was performed on a Bruker Avance I NMR spectrometer in a 9.4 T superconducting magnet, at 400 MHz 1H, 100 MHz 13C, MAS rate 10 kHz, 1H π/2 pulse 2.5 μs, contact time 2.5 ms, spin lock field 70 kHz with ramped pulse on 1H, spinal64 1H decoupling (100 kHz RF field) during signal acquisition, chemical shifts relative to external glycine methylene at 43.1 ppm relative to TSP at 0 ppm. Double Quantum Filtering (DQF): Initial 13C CP as above, followed by a 70 kHz POST-C7 sequence (Hohwy et al. 1998) applied on 13C to excite double quantum coherence in 0.4 ms, and returned to zero quantum by another 0.4 ms POST-C7 sequence with 100 kHz Lee-Goldberg decoupling on 1H, and 100 kHz spinal64 decoupling during acquisition. 256 Scans were accumulated per increment, 120 increments were used, and total experiment time was about 17 h