Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 17;101(11):4103–4109. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3989

Table 2.

Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Potential Factors Associated With PFS

Parameter Univariate Analysis
Multivariate Analysisa
HRb 95% CI P Valueb HR 95% CI P Valuea,b
Age (≤ vs > 65 y) 0.79 0.54–1.17 .24
Sex (male vs female) 1.26 0.86–1.84 .24
Baseline body weight (< vs ≥ median) 1.59 1.08–2.33 .02 1.55 1.03–2.32 004
Baseline ECOG performance status (< vs ≥ 1) 0.50 0.34–0.74 <.01 0.63 0.41–0.96 .03
Histology (follicular vs papillary) 0.64 0.43–0.97 .04 0.69 0.45–1.07 .10
Prior VEGF-targeted therapy (0 vs 1) 0.75 0.49–1.14 .18 0.86 0.55–1.34 .49
Baseline tumor size (< vs ≥ median) 0.49 0.33–0.72 <.01 0.61 0.40–0.94 .03
Percentage tumor reduction, wk 8 (< vs ≥ median) 1.67 1.11–2.50 .01 1.49 0.98–2.26 .06
a

Multivariate analysis includes only factors with P < .2 from univariate analyses.

b

HRs and P values were estimated with Cox proportional hazard models.