Table II.
First author, year | Country | Control group | Sample size | Infections | Sample size | Sample size | Infections | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | ||||||
Morales, 2000 | Spain | Placebo | 287 | 6 | 2.09 | Cefazolin 2 g. i.v. | 237 | 4 | 1.7 |
Yerdel, 2001 | Turkey | Placebo | 133 | 12 | 9.0 | Ampicillin + sulbactam 1.5 g. i.v. | 136 | 1 | 0.7 |
Aufenacker, 2004 | Netherlands | Placebo | 505 | 9 | 1.8 | Cefazolin 1 g. i.v. | 503 | 8 | 1.6 |
Celdran, 2004 | Spain | Placebo | 49 | 4 | 8 | Cefazolin 1 g. i.v.. | 50 | 0 | 0 |
Oteiza, 2004 | Spain | No treatment | 123 | 0 | 0 | Amoxicillin + clavulanic acid 2 g i.v. | 124 | 1 | |
Perez, 2005 | Philippines | Placebo | 180 | 7 | 3.9 | Cefazolin 1 g. i.v. | 180 | 4 | 2.2 |
Tzoravas, 2007 | Greece | Placebo | 193 | 9 | 4.6 | Amoxicillin + clavulanic acid 1.2 g. i.v. | 193 | 5 | 2.6 |
Jain, 2008 | India | Placebo | 60 | 1 | 1.7 | Amoxicillin + clavulanic acid 1.2 g. i.v. | 60 | 1 | 1.7 |
Shankar, 2010 | India | Placebo | 162 | 17 | 10.5 | Cefazolin 1 g .i.v. | 172 | 12 | 7 |
Ergul, 2011 | Turkey | Placebo | 100 | 7 | 7 | Cefazolin 1 g .i.v. | 100 | 5 | 5 |
Othman, 2011 | Egypt | Placebo | 48 | 6 | 2.88 | Amoxicillin + clavulanic acid 1.2 g. i.v. | 50 | 4 | 2 |
Mazaki, 2013 | Japan | Placebo | 100 | 13 | 13 | Cefazolin 1 g. i.v. | 100 | 2 | 2 |
1940 | 91 | 4.7 | 1905 | 47 | 2.5 |