Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 5;11(3):127–136. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2016.62800

Table II.

Randomized controlled trials

First author, year Country Control group Sample size Infections Sample size Sample size Infections
n % n %
Morales, 2000 Spain Placebo 287 6 2.09 Cefazolin 2 g. i.v. 237 4 1.7
Yerdel, 2001 Turkey Placebo 133 12 9.0 Ampicillin + sulbactam 1.5 g. i.v. 136 1 0.7
Aufenacker, 2004 Netherlands Placebo 505 9 1.8 Cefazolin 1 g. i.v. 503 8 1.6
Celdran, 2004 Spain Placebo 49 4 8 Cefazolin 1 g. i.v.. 50 0 0
Oteiza, 2004 Spain No treatment 123 0 0 Amoxicillin + clavulanic acid 2 g i.v. 124 1
Perez, 2005 Philippines Placebo 180 7 3.9 Cefazolin 1 g. i.v. 180 4 2.2
Tzoravas, 2007 Greece Placebo 193 9 4.6 Amoxicillin + clavulanic acid 1.2 g. i.v. 193 5 2.6
Jain, 2008 India Placebo 60 1 1.7 Amoxicillin + clavulanic acid 1.2 g. i.v. 60 1 1.7
Shankar, 2010 India Placebo 162 17 10.5 Cefazolin 1 g .i.v. 172 12 7
Ergul, 2011 Turkey Placebo 100 7 7 Cefazolin 1 g .i.v. 100 5 5
Othman, 2011 Egypt Placebo 48 6 2.88 Amoxicillin + clavulanic acid 1.2 g. i.v. 50 4 2
Mazaki, 2013 Japan Placebo 100 13 13 Cefazolin 1 g. i.v. 100 2 2
1940 91 4.7 1905 47 2.5