Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 15;8(10):4147–4159.

Table 4.

Correlation between the BLAF and serum levels of Hsp90-beta and clinicopathologic factors of lung cancer patients

Groups N BALF level of Hsp90-beta Serum level of Hsp90-beta


M±SD (ng/ml) df Statistical value P M±SD (ng/ml) df Statistical value P
Resource
    Benign 41 0.27±0.03 125 T=15.51 <0.05 0.36±0.02 125 T=21.3 <0.05
    Lung cancer 86 0.98±0.02 1.63±0.03
Histology
    LAC 28 0.98±0.23 2 F=3.876 0.06 1.58±0.2 2 F=0.92 0.40
    LSCC 46 0.93±0.27 1.63±0.44
    SCLC 12 1.14±0.07 1.74±0.08
Pathologic grade
    Undifferentiated 12 1.14±0.08 3 F=38.88 <0.05 1.74±0.08 3 F=21.77 <0.05
    Poorly 34 1.11±0.13 1.84±0.35
    Moderate 24 0.95±0.13 1.55±0.13
    Well 16 0.62±0.24 1.22±0.14
Lymphatic invasion
    N0 23 0.69±0.25 2 F=48.49 <0.05 1.32±0.36 2 F=21.53 <0.05
    N1-N3 53 1.07±0.13▲▲ 1.77±0.26▲▲
    Unavailable 10 1.02±0.19▲▲ 1.74±0.06▲▲
TNM stage
    I-II 21 0.67±0.24 2 F=44.38 <0.05 1.26±0.14 2
    III-IV 53 1.06±0.15 1.75±0.31 F=22.25 <0.05
    Unavailable 12 1.03±0.17 1.73±0.07

BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; LAC, adenocarcinoma of the lung; LSCC, squamous cell carcinoma of the lung; SCLC, small cell lung cancer;

cancerous compared with benign and non-cancerous;

undifferentiated and poorly compared with moderate and well;

▲▲

N1-N3 compared with N0;

III-IV compared with I-II;

M±SD, mean±standard deviation; df, degree of freedom.