Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 4;7:1651. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01651

Table 5.

Results of the analysis for Experiment 1.

Conditions Predictor Coefficient Std. error Wald Z p
MF vs. FM (Intercept) −3.04 0.43 −7.01 <0.01
GenComb −0.95 0.48 −1.96 0.05
MN vs. NM (Intercept) −2.68 0.30 −8.82 <0.01
GenComb 0.62 0.39 1.59 0.11