Table 6. Impact of Training Set on Linear Regression Parameters for the 13C and 15N Isotropic Shieldingsa.
training set | slope | intercept | RMSE | slope | intercept | RMSE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13C: Fragment PBE0 | 15N: Fragment PBE0 | |||||
1. Benchmark Set | –0.9661 | 179.45 | 1.74 | –1.0201 | 197.84 | 4.93 |
2. Polymorph Set | –0.9633 | 178.50 | 1.59 | –0.8987 | 182.86 | 0.73 |
3. Combined Set | –0.9648 | 179.01 | 1.63 | –1.0209 | 197.00 | 4.05 |
13C: GIPAW PBE | 15N: GIPAW PBE | |||||
1. Benchmark Set | –0.9893 | 169.05 | 2.46 | –1.0165 | 184.98 | 9.19 |
2. Polymorph Set | –0.9663 | 167.62 | 2.02 | –0.8496 | 164.87 | 2.38 |
3. Combined Set | –0.9746 | 168.13 | 2.08 | –1.0126 | 183.30 | 7.84 |
Reported slopes and intercepts were fitted using (1) only the previously published benchmark test set shifts (excluding form I acetaminophen from the 13C test set), (2) only the polymorph shifts from this work, or (3) the combination of both the benchmark and polymorph shifts. The RMS errors are reported for the polymorphic crystal 13C and 15N isotropic shifts in the polymorphic crystals studied in this work.