Table 4.
Group-1 (n = 1529) | Group-2 (n = 1721) | Group-3 (n = 1007) | p value | All patients (n = 4257) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF-36 | |||||
Physical functioning | 90 (70;100) | 85 (60;100) | 90 (65;100) | <0,001 ┼, ╪,0,203§ | 90 (65;100) |
Role physical, | 100 (50;100) | 100 (25;100) | 100 (25;100) | <0,001 ┼, ╪,0,721§ | 100 (50;100) |
Role emotional | 100 (33,3;100) | 100 (33,3;100) | 100 (33,3;100) | 0,001 ┼,0,004 ╪, 0,859§ | 100 (33,3;100) |
Vitality | 50 (45;70) | 55 (45;70) | 55 (40;70) | 0,060┼,0,167╪,0,819§ | 55 (40;70) |
Mental health | 72 (52;84) | 68 (52;80) | 68 (52;80) | 0,005 ┼,<0,001 ╪, 0,016 § | 68 (52;84) |
Social functioning | 87,5 (62,5;100) | 87,5 (62,5;100) | 87,5 (50;100) | 0,012 ┼,<0,001 ╪,0,006 § | 87,5 (62,5;100) |
Bodily pain | 100 (67,5;100) | 90 (67,5;100) | 90 (65;100) | 0,185┼, <0,001 ╪,0,013 § | 90 (67,5;100) |
General health | 65 (45;75) | 60 (45;70) | 60 (45;75) | <0,001 ┼, ╪,0,775§ | 60 (45;75) |
Physical component score | 79 (58,5;86) | 74 (54,5;84) | 74 (54;85) | <0,001 ┼, ╪,0,644§ | 75,5 (55,5;85) |
Mental component score | 74 (52,4;81,8) | 69,4 (50;80) | 67,8 (49;80,8) | <0,001 ┼,╪,0,511§ | 70,6 (50,3;80,8) |
HBQOL | |||||
Psychological Well-Being | 90 (67,5;97,5) | 85 (70;95) | 82,5 (65;95) | 0,019 ┼,<0,001 ╪,0,090§ | 85 (67,5;95) |
Anticipation anxiety | 80 (56,7;93,3) | 76,6 (53,3;90) | 70 (50;90) | 0,008 ┼, <0,001 ╪, 0,001 § | 76,6 (53,3;93,3) |
Vitality | 80 (64;88) | 76 (64;88) | 76 (60;88) | <0,001 ┼,0,001 ╪,0,758§ | 80 (64;88) |
Stigma | 93,3 (73,3;100) | 90 (73,3;100) | 90 (70;100) | 0,056┼, 0,001 ╪,0,071§ | 90 (73,3;100) |
Vulnerability | 80 (60;93,3) | 80 (60;93,3) | 73,3 (53,3;93,3) | <0,001 ┼,╪,0,300§ | 80 (60;93,3) |
Total score | 85 (67,1;93,6) | 80,7 (66,4;91,4) | 79,3 (63,9;90,7) | <0,001 ┼,╪,0,024 § | 81,4 (65,7;92,1) |
SF-36 Short Form-36, HBQOL Hepatitis B Quality of Life, Median (25 %, 75 %) are presented, Bonferroni correction was used, ┼significant difference was obtained in comparing group 1 and 2, ╪significant difference was observed between group 1 and 3, §significant difference was observed between group 2 and 3, bold data reflected a statistical significance