Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 4.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS. 2015 Jun;29(Suppl 1):S99–S107. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000664

Table 2.

Cross-sectional and longitudinal outcome analyses of parental HIV disclosure support intervention among N = 20 Chinese parents.

Total TAU group Intervention groupa Treatment effectb
Probability of higher disclosure distress % (SE) % (SE) % (SE) OR 95% CI
  Baseline 50.00 (0.52) 50.00 (0.53) 50.00 (0.53)
  4 weeks 40.00 (0.50) 50.00 (0.53) 30.00(S) (0.48) 0.43 0.08–2.28
  13 weeks 25.00 (0.44) 40.00 (0.52) 10.00*(L) (0.32) 0.17** 0.03–0.91
Probability of higher disclosure self-efficacy % (SE) % (SE) % (SE) OR 95% CI
  Baseline 35.00 (0.49) 20.00 (0.42) 50.00 (0.53)
  4 weeks 55.00 (0.51) 20.00 (0.42) 90.00***(L) (0.32) 9.00*** 2.06–39.29
  13 weeks 65.00 (0.49) 40.00 (0.52) 90.00***(L) (0.32) 3.38 0.45–25.36
Position on disclosure behaviours continuum Mean (SE) Mean (SE) Mean (SE) Beta 95% CI
  Baseline 0.95 (0.33) 0.70 (0.30) 1.20 (0.60)
  4 weeks 1.75 (0.19) 0.80 (0.32) 2.70***(L) (0.21) 1.40** 0.31–2.50
  13 weeks 2.20 (0.25) 1.40 (0.41) 3.00***(L) (0.29) 1.10 0.48 to 2.68

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

a

The significance levels for P values in this column are based on results of Wald tests.

b

The significance levels for P values in this column are based on results of Generalized Estimating Equations from baseline to respective end point (4 weeks or 13 weeks).

*

<0.1.

**

<0.05.

***

<0.01.

(S) and (L) refer to small and large effect sizes.