Table 1.
Factor structure of MOS-SSS using CFA
| Study | Location | Language | Sample characteristics | Model fit index | Problem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yu et al. [23] | China (Hong Kong) | Mandarin | 110 patients with heart failure | χ2/df 2.69 NFI 0.87 NNFI 0.90 CFI 0.91 |
Strong inter-factor correlation (0.88–0.99) Goodness-of-fit criteria marginally met |
| Gjesfjeld et al. [28] | USA | English | 330 mothers of children with mental illness | χ2/df 2.07 CFI 0.96 GFI 0.88 AGFI 0.85 RMSEA 0.06 SRMR 0.14 |
12/4-item has better fitting model |
| Robitaille et al. [21] | USA | English | 2,642 residents aged 55 above | CFI 0.96 TLI 0.99 RMSEA 0.076 CFI 0.96 TLI 0.99 RMSEA 0.047 |
Item cross-loading |
| Canada | French | 489 residents aged 55 above | Item cross-loading | ||
| Li [26] | China (Mainland) | Mandarin | 297 people living with HIV/AIDS | χ2/df 2.34 CFI 0.935 PNFI 0.761 PCFI 0.798 RMSEA 0.067 |
None |
| Wang et al. [28] | China (Mainland) | Mandarin | 200 CHD patients | χ2/df 2.79 IFI 0.92 NNFI 0.90 CFI 0.91 RMSEA0.064 |
None |