Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 4.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet HIV. 2014 Nov 24;1(3):e104–e111. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(14)00003-4

Appendix 3.

Direct versus indirect evidence for adherence to ART among HIV-positive patients, ITT analysis

Indirect Effects
Direct Effects SOC 1.46
(1.06, 2.00)		 1.00
(0.60, 1.68)		 1.57
(0.94, 2.61)		 1.06
(0.69, 1.63)		 1.65
(1.26, 2.17)		 2.07
(1.22, 3.53)		 1.83
(1.36, 2.47)
1.23
(0.75, 1.73)		 eSOC 0.69
(0.41, 1.15)		 1.08
(0.64, 1.82)		 1.08
(0.53, 2.25)		 1.42
(0.86, 2.35)		 1.26
(1.00, 1.58)
0.85
(0.49, 1.41)		 0.82
(0.47, 1.37)		 Alarm 1.56
(0.89, 2.71)
1.33
(0.76, 1.88)		 1.27
(0.73, 1.83)		 1.56
(0.89, 2.12)		 eSOC +
alarm
1.08
(0.52, 1.81)		 eSOC +
calendar 		1.16
(0.54, 2.40)
1.09
(0.67, 1.56)		 Daily SMS 1.56
(1.01, 2.40)
1.65
(1.25, 1.93)		 1.59
(1.00, 2.06)		 Weekly
SMS
2.64
(1.13, 3.49)		 1.24
(0.68, 1.84)		 SOC +
weekly SMS
1.89
(1.32, 2.26)		 1.23
(0.96, 1.48)		 1.21
(0.33, 2.50)		 eSOC +
supporter

Note: Each cell represents the comparison (odds ratio and 95% CrI) of the row treatment versus the column treatment below the diagonal and of the column treatment versus the row treatment above the diagonal.