Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 May 23;98(7):3010–3018. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-1516

Table 4.

Association Between Vitamin D Intake (Total and by Source) and All-Cause Mortality Among Men and Women in the CaMos

Vitamin D Intake Hazard Ratio (95% CI)a
Men Women
Total
 Moderate intake, 400–800 IU, 10–20 μg 1 (referent) 1 (referent)
 Low intake, <400 IU, <10 μg 0.97 (0.74–1.26) 1.08 (0.90–1.31)
 High intake, ≥800 IU, ≥20 μg 1.02 (0.60–1.73) 0.87 (0.63–1.21)
Dietary
 Milk only (per 5 μg) 0.98 (0.84–1.14) 0.99 (0.87–1.14)
Supplemental
 Supplement nonuser 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent)
 Supplement user 1.17 (0.92–1.48) 0.84 (0.71–0.99)
  Low dose, <400 IU, <10 μg 1.17 (0.78–1.75) 0.83 (0.64–1.08)
  Moderate dose, 400–800 IU, 10–20 μg 1.15 (0.87–1.52) 0.83 (0.69–1.01)
  High dose, ≥800 IU, ≥20 μg 1.24 (0.63–2.48) 0.91 (0.62–1.32)
a

Not adjusted for concurrent calcium intake due to collinearity. Adjusted for confounders: age, study center, education, BMI, health status (SF-36 PCS score), cigarette smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, sun exposure, self-reported comorbidity (in men and women: hypertension, heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, COPD, and kidney stones; in women only: osteoporosis, thyroid disease, IBD, breast cancer, and uterine cancer; in men only: prostate cancer), and medication (aspirin use or other NSAIDs).