Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 4.
Published in final edited form as: Osteoporos Int. 2011 Nov 16;23(7):2063–2065. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1830-8

Table 4.

Base–case analysis for incremental cost-effectiveness (cost per life year and QALY gained)

Denosumab vs. no treatment Denosumab vs. generic alendronate Denosumab vs. risedronate Denosumab vs. strontium ranelate
Costs/patient (€)
 Morbidity cost difference −2,181 −1,148 −1,403 −1,664
 Treatment cost differencea 1,868 1,529 1,055 939
 Cost in added life years 1,087 649 745 768
 Total cost difference 774 1,030 397 43
Avoided fractures during 10 years/1,000 patients
 Hip fractures −39 −20 −26 −32
 Vertebral fractures −62 −41 −45 −43
 NNT to avoid one hip fracture 26 50 39 32
 NNT to avoid one vertebral fracture 17 25 23 24
QALYs and life years/patient
 Life years gained (undiscounted) 0.068 0.040 0.046 0.048
 Life years gained (discounted) 0.047 0.028 0.032 0.033
 QALYs gained 0.084 0.049 0.057 0.060
 Cost/life year gained 16,531 37,082 12,409 1,290
 Cost per QALY gained (excluding CIALY) Cost saving 7,764 Cost saving Cost saving
 Cost per QALY gained 9,250 20,976 6,998 710

Women aged 71 years with a T-score at or below −2.5 SD and 34% prevalence of prior vertebral fracture

NNT number needed to treat

a

Including monitoring costs