Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 4.
Published in final edited form as: Osteoporos Int. 2011 Nov 16;23(7):2063–2065. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1830-8

Table 5.

Other sensitivity analyses (€/QALY)

Scenario Denosumab vs. no treatment Denosumab vs. generic alendronate Denosumab vs. risedronate Denosumab vs. strontium ranelate
Base–casea 9,250 20,976 6,998 710
Discount rates (5%) 9,576 22,622 6,868 133
Discount rates (0%) 9,414 19,285 7,793 2,139
One year DAPS persistence 10,656 28,501 8,548 214
Perfect persistence for all treatments 6,902 58,449 6,817 Cost saving
Denosumab maximum offset time 2 years 14,157 33,103 14,254 6,278
All treatments maximum offset time 2 years 14,157 27,970 11,897 5,127
10-year modelling horizon 5,484 22,422 1,454 Cost saving
GIAEsb for alendronate/risedronate 20,976 6,998
Disutility from fractures decreased by 10% 9,819 22,256 7,426 755
20% of excess mortality attributable to fractures 4,886 18,231 2,267 Cost saving
10 year treatment duration 8,758 21,455 6,457 Cost saving
Mortality after hip and vertebral fractures 3 years 6,084 18,780 3,475 Cost saving
Mortality after hip and vertebral fractures 5 years 8,157 20,182 5,766 Cost saving
a

The base case assumed discount rates of 3%, improved persistence for 3 years, max offset time of 5 years for all treatments, life-time horizon, no adverse events for any treatment, 5-year maximum treatment duration, 8 years of increased post-fracture mortality after hip and vertebral fractures

b

Gastrointestinal adverse events