Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 2;7:13338. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13338

Table 2. Reduced charge binding energies and metal charges.

Me(n-1)+ BEPhCN qf BEDMMP qf BEDMMP–BEPhCN Disp. (Calc)* Disp. (Exp) Agreement
Al2+ −7.45 1.36 −8.60 1.36 −1.15 Yes Yes Yes
Fe2+ −5.70 1.58 −8.08 1.37 −2.38 Yes Yes Yes
La2+ −4.06 1.77 −5.20 1.64 −1.14 Yes Yes Yes
Cd+ −1.91 0.74 −2.27 0.77 −0.36 Yes No No
Co+ −2.51 0.83 −2.54 0.61 −0.03 No No Yes
Cu+ −2.56 0.77 −2.81 0.70 −0.25 Yes Yes Yes
Ni+ −2.56 0.77 −2.78 0.67 −0.22 Yes No No
Zn+ −2.23 0.64 −2.79 0.67 −0.56 Yes No No
Ag0 −0.08 −0.05 −0.17 −0.04 −0.09 No bind No bind Yes
Na0 −0.19 −0.13 −0.44 −0.14 −0.25 No bind No bind Yes

Binding energy [eV] and final metal charge (qf) for the minimum energy structures of Men+–PhCN and Men+–DMMP using the reduced charge approach. Agreement regarding displacement events between theory and experiment was initially seen in seven of ten cases, as shown below. After the follow-up experiments, agreement regarding displacement increased to nine of ten cases (due to displacement of 5CB from Cd and Zn in the follow-up experiments). Further, the disagreement in the Ni case arises from only a very small difference (0.02 eV) between the displacement energy and the adopted energy threshold for the displacement event.

*Computed displacement of PhCN by DMMP.

Experimental displacement of PhCN by DMMP, from previous studies11.

Agreement between computed and experimental displacement. ‘No bind' indicates no homeotropic anchoring of the liquid crystal to the metal cation. Displacement is assumed to occur when BEDMMP− BEPhCN<−0.20 eV.