Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gut. 2016 May 5;66(8):1463–1473. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311421

Table 1.

Clinical, pathological, and molecular features according to the tumour CD274 expression score in 823 colorectal cancer cases

Characteristic* Total No. (n=823) Tumour CD274 expression score
0 (n=92) 1/2 (n=450) 3/4 (n=281) P value
Mean age±SD (yr) 69.1±9.0 69.9±9.5 69.6±8.9 68.1±8.9 0.06
Sex 0.11
 Men 365 (44%) 45 (49%) 209 (46%) 111 (39%)
 Women 458 (56%) 47 (51%) 241 (54%) 170 (61%)
Year of diagnosis 0.003
 Prior to 1999 407 (50%) 41 (45%) 204 (46%) 162 (58%)
 1999 to 2008 408 (50%) 50 (55%) 242 (54%) 116 (42%)
Family history of colorectal cancer in a first-degree relative 0.86
 Absent 642 (79%) 73 (80%) 354 (80%) 215 (78%)
 Present 168 (21%) 18 (20%) 90 (20%) 60 (22%)
Tumour location 0.06
 Proximal colon 412 (50%) 42 (46%) 233 (52%) 137 (49%)
 Distal colon 242 (30%) 22 (24%) 127 (29%) 93 (33%)
 Rectum 163 (20%) 28 (30%) 85 (19%) 50 (18%)
pT stage 0.034
 pT1 74 (10%) 16 (19%) 43 (10%) 15 (6%)
 pT2 150 (20%) 17 (20%) 82 (20%) 51 (20%)
 pT3 496 (65%) 47 (55%) 272 (65%) 177 (70%)
 PT4 38 (5%) 5 (6%) 22 (5%) 11 (4%)
pN stage 0.13
 pN0 450 (61%) 52 (67%) 259 (64%) 139 (56%)
 pN1 180 (25%) 16 (21%) 89 (22%) 75 (30%)
 pN2 102 (14%) 10 (13%) 59 (15%) 33 (13%)
M stage 0.17
 M0 641 (84%) 73 (91%) 351 (84%) 217 (83%)
 M1 118 (16%) 7 (9%) 65 (16%) 46 (17%)
Disease stage 0.12
 I 175 (23%) 23 (29%) 99 (24%) 53 (20%)
 II 245 (32%) 27 (34%) 143 (34%) 75 (29%)
 III 221 (29%) 23 (29%) 109 (26%) 89 (34%)
 IV 118 (16%) 7 (9%) 65 (16%) 46 (17%)
No. of negative lymph nodes 0.14
 0–4 159 (23%) 20 (27%) 86 (23%) 53 (23%)
 5–8 156 (23%) 12 (16%) 87 (23%) 57 (25%)
 9–14 178 (26%) 24 (32%) 86 (23%) 68 (30%)
 ≥15 185 (27%) 19 (25%) 115 (31%) 51 (22%)
Tumour differentiation 0.22
 Well to moderate 744 (91%) 78 (86%) 409 (91%) 257 (91%)
 Poor 77 (9%) 13 (14%) 40 (9%) 24 (9%)
Extent of extracellular mucin <0.0001
 0% 482 (60%) 45 (51%) 249 (56%) 188 (68%)
 1–50% 238 (29%) 22 (25%) 144 (32%) 72 (26%)
 ≥50% 90 (11%) 22 (25%) 51 (11%) 17 (6%)
Extent of signet ring cells 0.004
 0% 714 (88%) 73 (83%) 386 (87%) 255 (92%)
 1–50% 87 (11%) 11 (13%) 54 (12%) 22 (8%)
 ≥50% 8 (1%) 4 (5%) 4 (1%) 0 (0%)
Extent of solid tumour areas 0.06
 0% 583 (83%) 61 (80%) 308 (80%) 214 (88%)
 1–50% 96 (14%) 10 (13%) 63 (16%) 23 (9%)
 ≥50% 27 (4%) 5 (7%) 15 (4%) 7 (3%)
Tumour growth pattern 0.11
 Expansile 216 (29%) 33 (41%) 118 (29%) 65 (26%)
 Intermediate 413 (56%) 38 (48%) 231 (56%) 144 (57%)
 Infiltrative 113 (15%) 9 (11%) 61 (15%) 43 (17%)
MSI status 0.001
 MSI-low/MSS 663 (83%) 64 (70%) 358 (83%) 241 (87%)
 MSI-high 136 (17%) 27 (30%) 74 (17%) 35 (13%)
CIMP status 0.038
 Low/negative 622 (83%) 62 (76%) 330 (81%) 230 (87%)
 High 131 (17%) 20 (24%) 76 (19%) 35 (13%)
BRAF mutation 0.86
 Wild-type 683 (85%) 77 (84%) 368 (85%) 238 (86%)
 Mutant 120 (15%) 15 (16%) 66 (15%) 39 (14%)
KRAS mutation 0.11
 Wild-type 475 (59%) 64 (70%) 253 (58%) 158 (58%)
 Mutant 324 (41%) 28 (30%) 181 (42%) 115 (42%)
PIK3CA mutation 0.32
 Wild-type 641 (85%) 74 (86%) 359 (87%) 208 (83%)
 Mutant 111 (15%) 12 (14%) 55 (13%) 44 (17%)
Mean LINE-1 methylation level±SD (%) 62.3±9.7 63.6±9.4 62.7±10.0 61.1±9.2 0.035
Fusobacterium nucleatum DNA 0.041
 Negative 574 (87%) 60 (77%) 306 (86%) 208 (90%)
 Low 45 (7%) 9 (12%) 23 (6%) 13 (6%)
 High 44 (7%) 9 (12%) 26 (7%) 9 (4%)

Abbreviations: CIMP, CpG island methylator phenotype; LINE-1, long interspersed nucleotide element-1; MSI, microsatellite instability; MSS, microsatellite stable; SD, standard deviation.

*

Percentage indicates the proportion of cases with a specific clinical, pathological, or molecular feature in colorectal cancer cases with each tumour CD274 expression level. There were cases that had missing values for any of the characteristics except for age and sex.

To assess associations between tumour CD274 expression level and categorical variables (except for the extents of signet ring cells and solid tumour areas, for which Fisher’s exact test was performed), the chi-square test was performed. To compare mean age and mean LINE-1 methylation levels, an analysis of variance was performed. We adjusted two-sided α level to 0.002 (=0.05/22) by simple Bonferroni correction for multiple hypothesis testing.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure