Table 3.
Statistical analysis of model fits on variable pH [Gluc]t reaction progress curves ([Gluc]0 = 250 µM). AIC analysis was conducted between Lambert W(x) (simple) and modified Lambert W(x) (advanced) model fits in GraphPad Prism 6.0. For each substrate-wavelength-pH dataset, the ΔAICc is reported along with the percent probability that the modified Lambert W(x) model is preferred. DNC = did not converge.
pH | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Entry | Statistical Parameter |
λ (nm) |
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7.4 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
[5]t | ΔAICc | 220 | DNC | −3.93 | −15.62 | −7.20 | −6.71 | −4.21 | −3.98 | −3.99 | −4.18 |
227 | DNC | −4.19 | −19.88 | −9.88 | −6.71 | −4.17 | −4.63 | −3.99 | −5.62 | ||
235 | DNC | −3.53 | −26.65 | −12.06 | −6.13 | −3.93 | −4.80 | −4.16 | −3.93 | ||
241 | DNC | −3.72 | −24.33 | −9.73 | −5.90 | −3.92 | −3.47 | −4.01 | −4.13 | ||
Probability (%) |
220 | DNC | 12.3% | 0.0% | 2.7% | 3.4% | 10.9% | 12.0% | 12.0% | 11.0% | |
227 | DNC | 11.0% | <0.01% | 0.7% | 3.4% | 11.1% | 9.0% | 12.0% | 5.7% | ||
235 | DNC | 14.6% | <0.01% | 0.2% | 4.5% | 12.3% | 8.3% | 11.1% | 12.3% | ||
241 | DNC | 13.4% | <0.01% | 0.8% | 5.0% | 12.3% | 15.0% | 11.9% | 11.3% | ||
[6]t | ΔAICc | 227 | DNC | −3.59 | −5.22 | −11.20 | −6.75 | −11.71 | −5.24 | −4.74 | −5.18 |
235 | DNC | −3.06 | −5.32 | −9.72 | −7.90 | −11.40 | −5.48 | −4.74 | −5.42 | ||
241 | DNC | −3.44 | −5.11 | −10.82 | −9.35 | −10.51 | −5.57 | −4.58 | −5.33 | ||
Probability (%) |
227 | DNC | 14.3% | 6.8% | 0.4% | 3.3% | 0.3% | 6.8% | 8.5% | 7.0% | |
235 | DNC | 17.8% | 6.5% | 0.8% | 1.9% | 0.3% | 6.1% | 8.5% | 6.3% | ||
241 | DNC | 15.2% | 7.2% | 0.4% | 0.9% | 0.5% | 5.8% | 9.2% | 6.5% |