Table 1. Top Virtual Screening Hits across the Six PIF Pocket Models.
| Compound structurea | Docking rankb |
Kd
μMc (95% CI) |
LEd | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | M1R | M2 | M2R | M3 | M3R | ||||
| 1 |
|
6 | 39 | 29 | 66 | 1 | 2 | 39.1 (35.2-43.2) |
0.25 |
| 2 |
|
109 | 189 | 31 | 297 | 14 | 76 | >200 | - |
| 3 |
|
2808 | 158 | 125 | 125 | 491 | 294 | 39.4 (36.8-42.2) |
0.26 |
Charged states are depicted assuming a physiological pH of 7.4.
Ranks reported do not consider the molecules discarded by the geometry filter.
Kd was calculated from the IC50 in the FP assay using an equation that accounts for ligand depletion.1
Ligand efficiency (LE) is calculated as binding energy (ΔG, kcal/mol) per non-hydrogen atom.