Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Chem. 2015 Oct 12;58(20):8285–8291. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01216

Table 1. Top Virtual Screening Hits across the Six PIF Pocket Models.

Compound structurea Docking rankb Kd μMc
(95% CI)
LEd
M1 M1R M2 M2R M3 M3R
1 graphic file with name nihms-826510-t0006.jpg 6 39 29 66 1 2 39.1
(35.2-43.2)
0.25
2 graphic file with name nihms-826510-t0007.jpg 109 189 31 297 14 76 >200 -
3 graphic file with name nihms-826510-t0008.jpg 2808 158 125 125 491 294 39.4
(36.8-42.2)
0.26
a

Charged states are depicted assuming a physiological pH of 7.4.

b

Ranks reported do not consider the molecules discarded by the geometry filter.

c

Kd was calculated from the IC50 in the FP assay using an equation that accounts for ligand depletion.1

d

Ligand efficiency (LE) is calculated as binding energy (ΔG, kcal/mol) per non-hydrogen atom.