Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016 May 7;15(4):360–368. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2016.04.014

Table 4.

Interventions and Complications Related to Ascites Management

Patients Who Had Only
Paracenteses
Patients with Paracenteses and Drainage Catheter
Placement

n = 64 % n = 116 % P Value

Total number of serial paracenteses (range 1–7) <.001

  0 (not clinically indicated) 18 28 8 7

  1–2 37 58 60 52

  ≥3 9 14 48 42

Drainage catheters placed

  Tenckhoff catheter 108 93

    Removeda 6 5

    Replaceda 2 2

  Denver shunt 1 1

  Pleurx catheter 11 9

    Pleurex only 4 3

    Pleurex and Tenckhoff 7 6

  Pigtail catheter 4 3

    Pigtail only 3 3

    Pigtail and Tenckhoff 1 1

  Patients with ≥2 catheters 8 7

Patient with catheter- or paracentesis related complications <.001

  Yes 11 17 46 56

Specific type of complications

  SBP/peritonitis 4 26

  Ascites leakage 2 1

  Catheter malfunction 8

  Acute renal failureb 2 3

  Bowel perforation 1 2

  Othersc 2 5

Abbreviation: SBP = spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

a

Catheter removed/replaced secondary to: Tenckhoff malfunction (3), SBP/peritonitis (2), bleeding from catheter site (1), ascites leakage (2).

b

Consequence of increase fluid removal from serial paracentesis.

c

Cellulitis at catheter site (2), sepsis (2), bacteremia (1).