Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 21;8(5):388–395. doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.388

Fig. 3. Multiple comparisons resulting from the analysis of the mean fracture strength of different types of implants (one-way ANOVA, n = 10).

Fig. 3

*Significant difference (P < .05)

IT4S: Straumann Bone level, IT4D: Dentium superline, IT4N: Neobiotech CMI IS, IT2: Dentsply Xive s, MT2: Ankylos C/X, ET4: Neobiotech CMI EB