Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 22;179(12):308. doi: 10.1136/vr.103625

TABLE 3:

Baseline characteristics of the control (n=11) and intervention (n=13) flocks as recorded at visit 1

Control (n=11 flocks)
Intervention (n=13 flocks)
Variable Flock-adjusted prevalence (%) 95% CI* Flock-adjusted prevalence (%) 95% CI* P value†
Foot lesions
 CODD active 2.86 1.99 to 4.09 2.11 1.42 to 3.13 0.3
 CODD healed 5.78 4.31 to 7.72 4.61 2.91 to 7.24 0.4
 Footrot 12.14 8.60 to 16.87 30.24 19.17 to 44.20 0.002
 Scald 12.34 6.55 to 22.05 10.46 4.83 to 21.19 0.7
 Granuloma 0.52 0.37 to 0.74 0.19 4.9e−4 to 0.76 0.1
 White-line disease 22.95 15.45 to 32.67 32.50 21.55 to 45.77 0.2
 Foot abscess 0.20 0.10 to 0.41 0.19 0.10 to 0.36 0.9
 Interdigital hyperplasia 0.81 0.31 to 2.09 0.38 0.17 to 0.85 0.2
 Overgrown 2.20 1.18 to 4.04 1.11 0.53 to 2.30 0.1
 Lame 9.19 4.91 to 16.57 13.32 8.20 to 20.91 0.3
Flock variables n flocks % flocks 95% CI n flocks % flocks 95% CI P value‡
Farm size (ha)
 Small (28.3–52.6) 5 45.45 16.83 to 77.42 5 38.46 14.64 to 69.48 0.7
 Medium (60.7–78.9) 2 18.18 3.45 to 58.00 4 30.77 10.21 to 63.45 0.5
 Large (80.9–131.5) 4 36.36 11.67 to 71.20 4 30.77 10.21 to 63.45 0.8
Land type
 Hill 0 0 2 15.38 0.00 to 35.00 0.2
 Upland 4 36.36 7.93 to 64.79 5 38.46 12.01 to 64.91 0.9
 Lowland 7 63.64 35.21 to 92.07 6 46.15 19.05 to 73.25 0.4
Cattle 10 90.91 73.92 to 100 10 76.92 54.02 to 99.82 0.4
Breed
 Upland 8 72.73 46.41 to 99.05 10 76.92 54.02 to 99.82 0.8
 Lowland 11 100 12 92.31 77.83 to 100 0.4
Flock-adjusted proportion (%) 95% CI*   Flock-adjusted proportion (%) 95% CI* P value†
Age
 Lamb 7.39 2.87 to 17.76   17.97 8.45 to 34.21 0.2
 1 year 14.46 9.54 to 21.33   15.32 11.45 to 20.20 0.2
 Adult 78.14 67.76 to 85.88   66.72 50.71 to 79.61 0.2

For the foot lesions and for age, the flock-level prevalence/proportion (%) has been adjusted to account for the clustering at flock level for each group—control and intervention. For the other flock variables, the percentage of the control flocks and intervention flocks for each variable is calculated directly

*These 95% CIs are calculated using robust standard errors

†P value from a test of independence comparing the farm-adjusted mean farm prevalence for the control farms with that for the intervention farms for each variable using the Pearson χ2 statistic with the Rao and Scott (1981, 1984) second-order correction

‡P value from a two-sample test of proportions of flocks comparing the proportion of control flocks with the proportion of intervention flocks for each variable

CODD, contagious ovine digital dermatitis