Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 1;10:118–126. doi: 10.1016/j.gdata.2016.10.010

Table 2.

Data and meta-analysis. The ED stands for effective direction and the nagative and possitive each one respectively means protective effect and risk factor.

Gene Middleton et al. [58]
Beksac et al. [60]
Al Omar et al. [61]
Kim et al. [57]
Meta-analysis
Cancer N = 90 Control N = 100 Cancer N = 87 Control N = 154 Cancer N = 52 Control N = 70 Cancer N = 241 Control N = 159 P value (ED)
2DL1 86 94 77 147 51 70 241 159 0.32 (−)
2DL2 61 57 68 103 47 55 27 20 0.07 (+)
2DL3 69 85 48 56 240 159 0.99 (+)
2DL4 52 70 241 159 Excluded
2DL5 50 52 45 53 107 59 0.09 (+)
3DL1 83 91 51 66 229 156 0.45 (−)
3DL2 52 70 241 159 Excluded
3DL3 50 70 241 159 Excluded
2DS1 36 39 40 75 43 25 106 56 0.28
2DS2 61 58 54 103 46 50 31 31 0.09 (−)
2DS3 29 34 34 52 40 40 32 29 0.81 (+)
2DS4 82 91 51 70 229 156 0.41 (−)
2DS5 34 26 35 22 80 33 0.0001(+)****
3DS1 34 39 35 76 43 16 99 56 0.18 (+)
2DP1 52 70 241 159 Excluded
3DP1 52 70 241 159 Excluded
⁎⁎⁎⁎

Significance at P < 0.05 level.